Re: Intermediate Summary: Re: GNUstep.org website redesign proposal

[Richard Frith-Macdonald]

On 7 Jan 2014, at 10:37, David Chisnall <address@hidden> wrote:

> On 7 Jan 2014, at 10:26, Ivan Vučica <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> "Post-2007 features in language and language runtime"?
> 
> I read this as 'we support a 6-year old version of the language!  Yay!'
> 
>> I'd however go with Objective-C 2.0. Apple may have stopped using the name, 
>> but it is still a good historical descriptor without a suitable replacement. 
>> It is also a good name to point out a difference from a much simpler 
>> language (and runtime) that existed prior to that point.
> 
> I read 'Objective-C 2' as 'we support the features Apple introduced in 2005!  
> Yay!'

You may be unusual in that.

> Neither of these are the impression that we want to give.

How about 'Objective-C: The Next Generation' :-)