[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Intermediate Summary: Re: GNUstep.org website redesign proposal
From: |
Sebastian Reitenbach |
Subject: |
Re: Intermediate Summary: Re: GNUstep.org website redesign proposal |
Date: |
Tue, 07 Jan 2014 13:55:08 +0100 |
User-agent: |
SOGoMail 2.1.1b |
On Tuesday, January 7, 2014 13:23 CET, Richard Frith-Macdonald <address@hidden>
wrote:
>
> On 7 Jan 2014, at 12:16, Niels Grewe <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > (Sorry, forgot to CC the list)
> > > Anfang der weitergeleiteten Nachricht:
> > >> Von: Niels Grewe <address@hidden>
> >> Betreff: Re: Intermediate Summary: Re: GNUstep.org website redesign
> >> proposal
> >> Datum: 7. Januar 2014 13:00:12 MEZ
> >> An: David Chisnall <address@hidden>
> >> >> >> Am 07.01.2014 um 12:06 schrieb David Chisnall <address@hidden>:
> >> >>> On 7 Jan 2014, at 10:49, Richard Frith-Macdonald <address@hidden>
> >> >>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>> I read 'Objective-C 2' as 'we support the features Apple introduced
> >>> >>>>> in 2005! Yay!'
> >>>> >>>> You may be unusual in that.
> >>> >>> Possibly, but the 2006 WWDC was the first and last time Apple
> >>> >>> referred to a set of new Objective-C features as Objective-C 2. The
> >>> >>> term Objective-C 2 does not appear in current Apple docs,
> >> >> <nitpicking>
> >> That’s not quite true: Some of the documents still talk about something
> >> called "Objective-C 2.0“, most notably the runtime programming guide:
> >> >> https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/ObjCRuntimeGuide/Articles/ocrtVersionsPlatforms.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40008048-CH106-SW1
> >> </nitpicking>
> >> >> But that doesn’t make the term any more intelligible. I think we should
> >> >> prefer to use a concise description of the feature set over any
> >> >> marketing mumbo jumbo.
> I sympathise/agree with that ... but we have, on the website , a consice
> description of what gnustep is, and yet just had Doc O'Leary complaning
> because we didn't have a marketing mission statement.
>
> Probably we need both ... a good description and a marketing phrase to refer
> to it.
How about just calling it as simple as: "GNUstep Runtime"
That GNUstep runs on Objective-C, should be clear from the general description
about what GNUstep is anyways.
Then a page dedicated to the runtime, could go into the gory details of all the
nice features it provides.
cheers,
Sebastian
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnustep-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
- Fwd: Intermediate Summary: Re: GNUstep.org website redesign proposal, Niels Grewe, 2014/01/07
- Re: Intermediate Summary: Re: GNUstep.org website redesign proposal, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2014/01/07
- Re: Intermediate Summary: Re: GNUstep.org website redesign proposal,
Sebastian Reitenbach <=
- Re: Intermediate Summary: Re: GNUstep.org website redesign proposal, Stefan Bidi, 2014/01/07
- Re: Intermediate Summary: Re: GNUstep.org website redesign proposal, Markus Hitter, 2014/01/07
- Re: Intermediate Summary: Re: GNUstep.org website redesign proposal, David Chisnall, 2014/01/07
- FreeBSD Packages Was: Intermediate Summary, Fred Kiefer, 2014/01/07
- Re: FreeBSD Packages Was: Intermediate Summary, David Chisnall, 2014/01/07
- Re: Intermediate Summary: Re: GNUstep.org website redesign proposal, Riccardo Mottola, 2014/01/08
- Re: Intermediate Summary: Re: GNUstep.org website redesign proposal, Sebastian Reitenbach, 2014/01/08
- Re: Intermediate Summary: Re: GNUstep.org website redesign proposal, Stefan Bidi, 2014/01/08
- Re: Intermediate Summary: Re: GNUstep.org website redesign proposal, Sebastian Reitenbach, 2014/01/08
- Re: Intermediate Summary: Re: GNUstep.org website redesign proposal, Riccardo Mottola, 2014/01/08