[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: non-flattened filesystem layout
From: |
Wolfgang Lux |
Subject: |
Re: non-flattened filesystem layout |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Jun 2016 09:10:44 +0200 |
> Am 30.06.2016 um 01:23 schrieb Stefan Bidigaray <address@hidden>:
>
> LIBRARY COMBOS
> I don't understand why these are still needed. Can't the library combo be
> inferred from the architecture triplet, nowadays?
I'm still using both apple-apple-apple and gnu-gnu-gnu on OS X (the latter
requires a few manual tweaks to get it working though). So I guess my answer to
your question is no.
> Maybe this was something that made sense when GNUstep first started, as there
> were so many completing ObjC libraries? Currently, I'm not entirely convinced
> this makes sense. For example, if you are deploying for apple-apple-apple
> your arch-triplet is x86_64-apple-darwin (or is it x86_64-apple-apple? I
> don't know), right? Is anything besides gnu-gnu-gnu and apple-apple-apple
> still around? As far as I can tell, adding this directory makes our
> non-flattened system incompatible with the Debian multi-arch system. And
> honestly, I'm not sure it is still buying us anything of value. It should be
> up to the person compiling GNUstep to ensure that they are not mixing the
> GNUstep libraries and something else that might be compatible. I mean, this
> person should know.
Wolfgang