[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Upcoming 0.26.0, please review release notes
From: |
David Chisnall |
Subject: |
Re: Upcoming 0.26.0, please review release notes |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Dec 2017 09:33:49 +0000 |
Is it possible to just push out a minor release to base that adds the missing
enum? I am working on some fixes for memory management in base that I’d like
to make it into the next release, but I can’t guarantee finishing in the next
couple of days.
David
> On 11 Dec 2017, at 07:45, Fred Kiefer <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> I was hoping for Richard to step up here. If he doesn’t response today, we
> should try to go ahead ourselves. I could help later today with the news.texi
> file. My impression is that we should use a version number of 1.26.0 as quite
> a few changes have piled up.
> The release process itself would again be on your side, as you have the
> required key for it. It would be great to have this one out tonight to reduce
> the confusion that comes from the gui release.
> Not sure whether we need another gui release to document the increased base
> version. I think we could do without it.
>
> Fred
>
>> Am 11.12.2017 um 00:03 schrieb Ivan Vučica <address@hidden>:
>>
>> I'm happy to help as needed.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 10, 2017, 20:26 Fred Kiefer <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Am 09.12.2017 um 14:43 schrieb Ivan Vučica <address@hidden>:
>>>
>>> I have no opinion on whether we need a synced release; -gui is certainly in
>>> need of it as Debian is blocked from pulling in even 0.25.1.
>>
>> Turns out some to the changes Daniel made in gui require the new enums he
>> added to base. That is, GNUstep gui 0.26.0 depends on the unreleased GNustep
>> base. That way Debian and all the other systems won’t benefit from that gui
>> release until there is also a base release. And we need to update the
>> documented required base version in gui.
>>
>> Fred
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnustep-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
- Upcoming 0.26.0, please review release notes, Ivan Vučica, 2017/12/07
- Re: Upcoming 0.26.0, please review release notes, Ivan Vučica, 2017/12/07
- Re: Upcoming 0.26.0, please review release notes, Yavor Doganov, 2017/12/08
- Re: Upcoming 0.26.0, please review release notes, Fred Kiefer, 2017/12/09
- Re: Upcoming 0.26.0, please review release notes, Ivan Vučica, 2017/12/09
- Re: Upcoming 0.26.0, please review release notes, Fred Kiefer, 2017/12/10
- Re: Upcoming 0.26.0, please review release notes, Ivan Vučica, 2017/12/10
- Re: Upcoming 0.26.0, please review release notes, Fred Kiefer, 2017/12/11
- Re: Upcoming 0.26.0, please review release notes,
David Chisnall <=
- Re: Upcoming 0.26.0, please review release notes, Ivan Vučica, 2017/12/11
- Re: Upcoming 0.26.0, please review release notes, David Chisnall, 2017/12/11
- Re: Upcoming 0.26.0, please review release notes, Ivan Vučica, 2017/12/11
- Re: Upcoming 0.26.0, please review release notes, David Chisnall, 2017/12/11
- Re: Upcoming 0.26.0, please review release notes, Ivan Vučica, 2017/12/11
- Re: Upcoming 0.26.0, please review release notes, Fred Kiefer, 2017/12/12
- Re: Upcoming 0.26.0, please review release notes, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2017/12/12
- Re: Upcoming 0.26.0, please review release notes, David Chisnall, 2017/12/14
- [CFT] base and libobjc2 changes [Re: Upcoming 0.26.0, please review release notes], David Chisnall, 2017/12/17
- Re: Upcoming 0.26.0, please review release notes, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2017/12/11