Re: [Gomp-discuss] Plan ... coments wanted !

[Lars Segerlund]

 Perhaps we should submit a short statement on the webpage ?

 Something like, enhance the gcc backend to understand parrallell 
constructs, and do an openMP implementation that takes advantage of this 
new infrastructure.

 As I can understand you are the only one hwo can update.

  I have some experience of compiler writing, however more of one pass 
assemblers and linkers, I haven't done any heavy 'modern' optimization 
stuff, but I think I have got the teory down pretty well and have some 
experience in other areas that might come in handy, ( I'm doing hard 
realtime systems for a living ).

 / Lars Segerlund.

Biagio Lucini wrote:
> On 31 Jan 2003, Steven Bosscher wrote:
>
>
> > Feel reassured that I have never written a compiler before?  And maybe
> > Lars and Biagio haven't either.
>
>
> More than that: I really lack the basic concepts and had to buy a textbook
> to at least have a rough idea of what you are talking about...
>
>
> > Oh well, we're smart people, aren't we?
> > O:-)
>
>
> Hope so :-)
>
> Well, my added value to the "junk" I have written above: since I know some
> C, none of C++ and fairly well Fortran, what I could do is to look at the
> OpenMP specifications for Fortran in the next few days.
>
> Biagio
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gomp-discuss mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gomp-discuss