Re: [Gomp-discuss] Copyright Assignment

[Lars Segerlund]

 I mean while we are still coding them and waiting on our licences.

 A library is fairly selfcontained, so it should only be a lib with 
everything in and perhaps a patch to the build system of gcc.

 I also suggets we make a doc directory on savannah to collect 
everything we can gather :-) , and start writing a formal spec of the 
part's we know how to do, also over algoriths we intend to use and data 
structures, this since I find it a major flaw of gcc that this kind of 
info is hard to find and access.

 If you look at Diego's paper it is quite clear and documents the 
workings, algorithms and data structures used, the same cannot be said 
for large parts of gcc :-) .

 ( I haven't been able to find all the info I want, and I have been 
looking, I have had to resort ot the source, and it's a bit of a tick 
off for someone wanting to give a hand. )

 Perhaps it's time to contact our webmaster and to sum up what we want 
on the page ?

Biagio Lucini wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Lars Segerlund wrote:
>
>
> >  can't we put the lib on savannah for now ?
>
>
> Technically it should not be a problem. Practically an integrated
> approach (i.e. everything in the branch) would possibly be better. Unless
> you mean "while we are still coding them and they arent working yet".
>
> Biagio
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gomp-discuss mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gomp-discuss