[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Gomp-discuss] copyright assignements
From: |
Scott Robert Ladd |
Subject: |
RE: [Gomp-discuss] copyright assignements |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Feb 2003 08:03:40 -0500 |
Steven Boscher wrote:
> Does not. Had you filed it for GCC, you would have been allowed to work
> on g95 and gomp with the same assignment. Now you need a new one for
> gcc...
Well, I sent e-mail to GNU, and have exchanged some discussion with Jessica
Natale. I've filed for GCC; I'd originally listed both GCC and "GOMP", but
she'd never heard of GOMP, and so I told her to file me just for GCC.
This is a lot like doing NDAs for commercial products, although companies
tend to be rather quick about such things.
Meanwhile, I'll await soem sort of offcial word before contributing any
code.
..Scott
- [Gomp-discuss] copyright assignements, Lars Segerlund, 2003/02/12
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] copyright assignements, Steven Bosscher, 2003/02/12
- RE: [Gomp-discuss] copyright assignements,
Scott Robert Ladd <=
- RE: [Gomp-discuss] copyright assignements, Biagio Lucini, 2003/02/12
- RE: [Gomp-discuss] copyright assignements, Steven Bosscher, 2003/02/12
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] copyright assignements, Pop Sébastian, 2003/02/12
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] copyright assignements, Steven Bosscher, 2003/02/12
- RE: [Gomp-discuss] copyright assignements, Scott Robert Ladd, 2003/02/12