Re: [Gomp-discuss] Organization of libgomp source code

[Biagio Lucini]

I still think that a *fake* implementation can be done in a cheap way, but
it is not prioritary at the moment and anyway as usual I'll agree with  
the majority.

Biagio

On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Lars Segerlund wrote:

> 
>   Ok, sorry if I have been pestering everybody on this point, I will 
> drop it.
> 
>   / Lars.
> 
> Steven Bosscher wrote:
> > Op di 18-02-2003, om 12:48 schreef Lars Segerlund:
> > 
> >>.. also we should if possible make our binaries run without libgomp and 
> >>threads, a fallback to nuthing. ( it's easy and might make life easier 
> >>for a lot of people ).
> > 
> > 
> > I completely fail to understand why you think it is so important to make
> > all this work without a library.
> > 
> > If people don't want the library, they should just not compile their
> > software with OpenMP enabled.  Easy as that.  You can have stubs that
> > don't do anything (like in the specs) but that is still a library.
> > 
> > It is not easy to *not* have a library at all AFAICS.  Either the
> > compiler generates calls to the library so you need the library, or the
> > compiler does not generate library calls and you don't need the
> > library.  Try anything else and the whole thing won't even link.  
> > 
> > Greetz
> > Steven
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gomp-discuss mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gomp-discuss
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gomp-discuss mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gomp-discuss
>