[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gomp-discuss] Decision about semaphores ..
From: |
Steven Bosscher |
Subject: |
Re: [Gomp-discuss] Decision about semaphores .. |
Date: |
19 Feb 2003 11:08:25 +0100 |
Op wo 19-02-2003, om 11:01 schreef Lars Segerlund:
>
> I am trying to write some semaphores for the fork/join of threads, (
> more specificly the join ), and I have the decision on using primitives
> from POSIX threads, or an asm macro using native instructions in the
> target cpu to do atomic updates.
>
> What is the opinion on this among you people ?
>
> The native instruction approach is FAST, however it would be easier to
> support different architectures by using the threading lib ?
>
> It's just the overhead of the join and such that concerns me.
>
> / Lars Segerlund.
>
<dumb look>
Would you mind explaining to the not-a-computer-scientist here what a
semaphore is? :-)
Greetz
Steven
- [Gomp-discuss] Decision about semaphores .., Lars Segerlund, 2003/02/19
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Decision about semaphores ..,
Steven Bosscher <=
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Decision about semaphores .., Pop Sébastian, 2003/02/19
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Decision about semaphores .., Lars Segerlund, 2003/02/19
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Decision about semaphores .., Steven Bosscher, 2003/02/19
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Decision about semaphores .., Lars Segerlund, 2003/02/19
- RE: [Gomp-discuss] Decision about semaphores .., Scott Robert Ladd, 2003/02/19
- RE: [Gomp-discuss] Decision about semaphores .., Steven Bosscher, 2003/02/19
Re: [Gomp-discuss] Decision about semaphores .., Biagio Lucini, 2003/02/19