Re: [Gomp-discuss] CIL representation ...

[Biagio Lucini]

On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Lars Segerlund wrote:

>
>   I read the CIL doc's, and this sums it up.
>   CIL doesn't have everything needed to represent a parallell program at
> the abstract level, it got locks and mutexes and non of the dependencies
> needed for the variables. It's not a graph, it's a bytecode, so I think
> we can drop it as a format interesting for gomp.
>

That is also my conclusion. The first part talks about phantomatic library
for threading whose specifications are nowhere found in the standard, and
anyway those are runtime libraries, not intermediate representation
callback or similar. I think we have to create our stuff...

Biagio