Re: [gpsd-dev] AIS: IMO236/289 Met/hydro message

[Eric S. Raymond]

christian Gagneraud <address@hidden>:
> So the question of the day is: which way should be taken to address
> this issue? I personally think that the #2 is cleaner, but i would
> have no problem taking the path #1

I wrote the present AIS code.  I agree with you, #2 is cleaner and
you should fix it that way.  I'll take a patch.

If you're willing to take over maintaining the AIS code and don't
yet have commit access to the repo, let's fix that.
-- 
                <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>