[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gpsd-dev] Running regression tests
From: |
Eric S. Raymond |
Subject: |
Re: [gpsd-dev] Running regression tests |
Date: |
Sun, 20 May 2012 21:42:30 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Christian Gagneraud <address@hidden>:
> >Which one? More generally, how many untested types can you add to our
> >test coverage?
>
> For now, it will be the only one unfortunately. It is Type 6,
> DAC=250, FI=10. It's for AtoN status message in Ireland and in the
> UK (w/ DAC=235). These are parts of the GLA standards (General
> Lighthouse Authorities).
That's good to know.
> I'm trying to get my hand as well on an AtoN that can send the
> met/hydro, version IMO289, but I can't make any promise on that one.
> Manufacturers are just starting to support it in place of the IMO236 one.
That's also good to know. Thanks.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
- [gpsd-dev] Running regression tests, christian Gagneraud, 2012/05/19
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Running regression tests, Eric S. Raymond, 2012/05/20
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Running regression tests, christian Gagneraud, 2012/05/20
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Running regression tests, Eric S. Raymond, 2012/05/20
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Running regression tests, christian Gagneraud, 2012/05/20
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Running regression tests, Eric S. Raymond, 2012/05/20
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Running regression tests, Christian Gagneraud, 2012/05/20
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Running regression tests, Eric S. Raymond, 2012/05/20
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Running regression tests, Christian Gagneraud, 2012/05/20
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Running regression tests,
Eric S. Raymond <=