[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gpsd-dev] A detail in your ntpoffset script
From: |
Dave Platt |
Subject: |
Re: [gpsd-dev] A detail in your ntpoffset script |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Oct 2013 13:09:06 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 |
> I see where you are going. But I have gottent tow PPS to agree to
> better than 1 uSec so I do not think it is a measurement error on
> my part.
>
> The error is attached to the GPS, not to the port or host I conenct
> it to. So it is a characteristic of the GPS, not the measurement
> techniwue.
It would be interesting to measure the electrical offset by a separate
technique which is completely independent of the host interface
timing.
If both GPS systems have explicit PPS outputs, using a dual-trace
digital storage 'scope whose trigger is tied to one of the two
PPS edges would give a very good look at the actual timing.
Won't work with USB-output-only GPS'es, of course.
- Re: [gpsd-dev] A detail in your ntpoffset script, (continued)
Re: [gpsd-dev] A detail in your ntpoffset script, Gary E. Miller, 2013/10/22
Re: [gpsd-dev] A detail in your ntpoffset script, Eric S. Raymond, 2013/10/22
Re: [gpsd-dev] A detail in your ntpoffset script, Hal Murray, 2013/10/23
Re: [gpsd-dev] A detail in your ntpoffset script, Gary E. Miller, 2013/10/23
Re: [gpsd-dev] A detail in your ntpoffset script,
Dave Platt <=
Re: [gpsd-dev] A detail in your ntpoffset script, Gary E. Miller, 2013/10/23
Re: [gpsd-dev] A detail in your ntpoffset script, Eric S. Raymond, 2013/10/23
Re: [gpsd-dev] A detail in your ntpoffset script, Harlan Stenn, 2013/10/23
Re: [gpsd-dev] A detail in your ntpoffset script, Harlan Stenn, 2013/10/23
Re: [gpsd-dev] A detail in your ntpoffset script, Gary E. Miller, 2013/10/23
Re: [gpsd-dev] A detail in your ntpoffset script, Sanjeev Gupta, 2013/10/24
Re: [gpsd-dev] A detail in your ntpoffset script, Andy Walls, 2013/10/22