[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures
From: |
Eric S. Raymond |
Subject: |
Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Nov 2013 20:24:55 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Greg Troxel <address@hidden>:
> 0.001/0.4 was not ok
Remind me of your OS and hardware? I want to start tracking the
failure thresholds for these figures on different platforms. Some
pattern might emerge.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- [gpsd-dev] new regression failures, Greg Troxel, 2013/11/10
- Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures, Eric S. Raymond, 2013/11/10
- Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures, Hal Murray, 2013/11/10
- Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures, Greg Troxel, 2013/11/10
- Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures,
Eric S. Raymond <=
- Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures, Greg Troxel, 2013/11/11
- Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures, Eric S. Raymond, 2013/11/11
- Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures, Greg Troxel, 2013/11/11
- Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures, Eric S. Raymond, 2013/11/11
- Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures, Hal Murray, 2013/11/11
- Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures, Hal Murray, 2013/11/11