[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures
From: |
Hal Murray |
Subject: |
Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Nov 2013 09:40:27 -0800 |
address@hidden said:
> 3. Michael Tatarinov's numbers on an ARM running at less than half the clock
> speed of my Core Duo strongly suggest that hardware speed isn't the main
> driver, nor is architecture. Whgat does that leave but overhead differences
> at the software level?
Watch top while running the tests. The CPU is idle.
My guess is a missing wakeup that gets caught by a timer.
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
- [gpsd-dev] new regression failures, Greg Troxel, 2013/11/10
- Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures, Eric S. Raymond, 2013/11/10
- Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures, Hal Murray, 2013/11/10
- Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures, Greg Troxel, 2013/11/10
- Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures, Eric S. Raymond, 2013/11/10
- Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures, Greg Troxel, 2013/11/11
- Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures, Eric S. Raymond, 2013/11/11
- Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures, Greg Troxel, 2013/11/11
- Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures, Eric S. Raymond, 2013/11/11
- Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures,
Hal Murray <=
- Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures, Hal Murray, 2013/11/11