[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gpsd-dev] regression test puzling non-failure which should probably
From: |
Greg Troxel |
Subject: |
Re: [gpsd-dev] regression test puzling non-failure which should probably fail |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Jan 2015 08:12:33 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.4 (berkeley-unix) |
I see, so this is a failure to run the test, not a test failure. Is it
really trying the port in one half before forking? I am seeing it
fairly often, 3/13 on my netsbd-5 adm64 box (which does a lot of other
stuff).
I wonder if it would make sense to try running the test up to 10 times,
to avoid losing test coverage.
I'm also seeing this (on mac):
gpsfake: socket error [Errno 57] Socket is not connected.
pgpVqtoByOhz3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- [gpsd-dev] regression test puzling non-failure which should probably fail, Greg Troxel, 2015/01/29
- Re: [gpsd-dev] regression test puzling non-failure which should probably fail, Greg Troxel, 2015/01/29
- Re: [gpsd-dev] regression test puzling non-failure which should probably fail, Hal Murray, 2015/01/29
- Re: [gpsd-dev] regression test puzling non-failure which should probably fail, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/01/29
- Re: [gpsd-dev] regression test puzling non-failure which should probably fail,
Greg Troxel <=
- Re: [gpsd-dev] regression test puzling non-failure which should probably fail, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/01/30
- Re: [gpsd-dev] regression test puzling non-failure which should probably fail, Greg Troxel, 2015/01/30
- Re: [gpsd-dev] regression test puzling non-failure which should probably fail, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/01/30
- Re: [gpsd-dev] regression test puzling non-failure which should probably fail, Hal Murray, 2015/01/30
- Re: [gpsd-dev] regression test puzling non-failure which should probably fail, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/01/30
- Re: [gpsd-dev] regression test puzling non-failure which should probably fail, Hal Murray, 2015/01/30
- Re: [gpsd-dev] regression test puzling non-failure which should probably fail, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/01/31