[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gpsd-dev] Major progress!
From: |
Eric S. Raymond |
Subject: |
Re: [gpsd-dev] Major progress! |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Feb 2015 19:55:54 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
Gary E. Miller <address@hidden>:
> > Right. If the segments were the same size you wouldn't have this
> > problem. It's only going to come up in the wake of a change that
> > breaks compatibility with older versions of struct gps_device_t.
>
> Partly. Compile options also change the size.
True.
> But, since this is the test code, are not the gpsd and test harness
> compiled at the same time? With the same options? Thus there should be
> no size conflict. Ever.
Yeah, Hal's situation seems to be that he's running an older production
gpsd and tests on a newer one at the same time.
> As long as the test shmid is cleaned up after the tests are done.
Hm. Should I move the segment removal to the end of the test sequence?
Right now it's done first.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
Re: [gpsd-dev] Major progress!, Hal Murray, 2015/02/09
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Major progress!, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/02/09
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Major progress!, Gary E. Miller, 2015/02/09
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Major progress!,
Eric S. Raymond <=
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Major progress!, Gary E. Miller, 2015/02/09
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Major progress!, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/02/09
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Major progress!, Hal Murray, 2015/02/10
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Major progress!, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/02/10
Re: [gpsd-dev] Major progress!, Hal Murray, 2015/02/09
Re: [gpsd-dev] Major progress!, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/02/10
Re: [gpsd-dev] Major progress!, Hal Murray, 2015/02/10