[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gpsd-dev] OS X dropped. How I think about our platform priorities
From: |
Eric S. Raymond |
Subject: |
Re: [gpsd-dev] OS X dropped. How I think about our platform priorities |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Feb 2015 10:02:08 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
Bernd Zeimetz <address@hidden>:
> On 02/18/2015 07:21 PM, address@hidden (Eric S. Raymond) wrote:
> > In my opinion it's Android and the embedded deployments like OpenWRT
> > that are the really big deal these days. Certainly they completely
> > dominate our numbers, with firmware instances literally into the
> > billions.
> >
> > Correspondingly, GPSD on laptop Linux and *BSDs is not as functionally
> > important as it used to be.
>
> That is imho not true in times where a default kde installation libgps to
> retrieve location information.
>
> So only in Debian we have ~18000 installations of libgps20
> https://qa.debian.org/popcon-graph.php?packages=libgps20
>
> and as soon as jessie is released I expect the same numbers for libgps21.
> https://qa.debian.org/popcon-graph.php?packages=libgps21
That is interesting information, thanks. But ~18000 is statistical noise
compared to the embedded deployments. There's at least four orders of
magnitude difference there!
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
- Re: [gpsd-dev] OS X dropped. How I think about our platform priorities, (continued)
Re: [gpsd-dev] OS X dropped. How I think about our platform priorities, Gary E. Miller, 2015/02/18
Re: [gpsd-dev] OS X dropped. How I think about our platform priorities, Bernd Zeimetz, 2015/02/22
- Re: [gpsd-dev] OS X dropped. How I think about our platform priorities,
Eric S. Raymond <=