[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gpsd-dev] Updated docs on NTP segment management
From: |
Harlan Stenn |
Subject: |
Re: [gpsd-dev] Updated docs on NTP segment management |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Mar 2015 20:26:00 +0000 |
"Eric S. Raymond" writes:
> Harlan Stenn <address@hidden>:
> > So aside from your patch, I need to have configure look for stdatomic.h,
> > and iff we find it we #include stdatomic.h in refclock_shm.c, right?
> > Once that's done the rest should be OK?
>
> I believe so, yes. Of course I could have a bug in the way shm_query()
> is mated to shm_timer(), but I think the logging will make that pretty
> obvious to diagnose if I do.
OK, after more looking I'm curious about the STD_ATOMIC_H guard - that's
something that needs to be set too, right?
If so, I'm wondering if it would be better to use something configure
will detect for us, either HAVE_STDATOMIC_H (for the header file) or
HAVE_ATOMIC_THREAD_FENCE (for the function we want to use).
H
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Updated docs on NTP segment management, Harlan Stenn, 2015/03/03
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Updated docs on NTP segment management, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/03/03
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Updated docs on NTP segment management, Hal Murray, 2015/03/04
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Updated docs on NTP segment management, Gary E. Miller, 2015/03/04
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Updated docs on NTP segment management, Hal Murray, 2015/03/05
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Updated docs on NTP segment management, Harlan Stenn, 2015/03/05
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Updated docs on NTP segment management, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/03/05
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Updated docs on NTP segment management, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/03/05
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Updated docs on NTP segment management, Gary E. Miller, 2015/03/05
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Updated docs on NTP segment management, Frank Nicholas, 2015/03/05
Re: [gpsd-dev] Updated docs on NTP segment management, Harlan Stenn, 2015/03/03