[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gpsd-dev] Port to QNX: PPS without SHM?
From: |
Gary E. Miller |
Subject: |
Re: [gpsd-dev] Port to QNX: PPS without SHM? |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Jan 2016 12:17:33 -0800 |
Yo Norton!
On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 10:12:01 -0500
Norton Allen <address@hidden> wrote:
> I should point out that at this point, both gpsd and ntpd have local
> modifications. It might make sense for me to back out my PPS mods to
> gpsd, for example, to see if that makes any difference. The ntpd mods
> so far should be just steps necessary for porting.
If you are going to get deep into the ntpd code, may I suggest you look
at ntpsec.org instead of ntpd? It is a fork of ntpd that has been
modernized and moved to POSIX standards. You should have no troubles
getting help from them on porting it to QNX and getting your port in the
mainline.
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
address@hidden Tel:+1 541 382 8588
pgpBw0Y8uX0ZZ.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Port to QNX: PPS without SHM?, (continued)
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Port to QNX: PPS without SHM?, Hal Murray, 2016/01/06
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Port to QNX: PPS without SHM?, Norton Allen, 2016/01/06
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Port to QNX: PPS without SHM?, Norton Allen, 2016/01/06
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Port to QNX: PPS without SHM?, Gary E. Miller, 2016/01/06
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Port to QNX: PPS without SHM?, Norton Allen, 2016/01/06
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Port to QNX: PPS without SHM?, Gary E. Miller, 2016/01/06
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Port to QNX: PPS without SHM?,
Gary E. Miller <=
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Port to QNX: PPS without SHM?, Eric S. Raymond, 2016/01/06
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Port to QNX: PPS without SHM?, Hal Murray, 2016/01/07
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Port to QNX: PPS without SHM?, Gary E. Miller, 2016/01/06