[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gpsd-dev] ✘regress-driver broken
From: |
Fred Wright |
Subject: |
Re: [gpsd-dev] ✘regress-driver broken |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:44:58 -0700 (PDT) |
On Thu, 7 Apr 2016, Gary E. Miller wrote:
> Yo Fred!
>
> On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:22:09 -0700
> "Gary E. Miller" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > Which brings up another issue, where does the 4K limit come from?
>
> I found it. I increased the read max to 8192 from 4096. That did not
> seem to break anything.
>
> Thanks for getting me to that problem.
>
> Change pushed.
The 4K is just an arbitrary reasonable buffer size. There's no need for
it to contain a complete line when the code works correctly. The buffer
that's used to return the data to the caller is dynamic and independent of
the read buffer size.
Fred Wright
- Re: [gpsd-dev] ✘regress-driver broken, (continued)
- Re: [gpsd-dev] ✘regress-driver broken, Eric S. Raymond, 2016/04/07
- Re: [gpsd-dev] ✘regress-driver broken, Gary E. Miller, 2016/04/07
- Re: [gpsd-dev] ✘regress-driver broken, Eric S. Raymond, 2016/04/07
- Re: [gpsd-dev] ✘regress-driver broken, Gary E. Miller, 2016/04/07
- Re: [gpsd-dev] ✘regress-driver broken, Fred Wright, 2016/04/07
- Re: [gpsd-dev] ✘regress-driver broken, Fred Wright, 2016/04/07
- Re: [gpsd-dev] ✘regress-driver broken, Fred Wright, 2016/04/07
- Re: [gpsd-dev] ✘regress-driver broken, Fred Wright, 2016/04/07
- Re: [gpsd-dev] ✘regress-driver broken, Gary E. Miller, 2016/04/07
- Re: [gpsd-dev] ✘regress-driver broken, Gary E. Miller, 2016/04/07
- Re: [gpsd-dev] ✘regress-driver broken,
Fred Wright <=