gpsd-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [gpsd-dev] ARM port problem in rtcm3.2 handling


From: Hal Murray
Subject: Re: [gpsd-dev] ARM port problem in rtcm3.2 handling
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 10:47:04 -0700

address@hidden said:
> Interesting.  Been a while since I dug out the C99 standard.  I had assumed
> char was always signed, but C99 Section 6.2.5 15) clearly sates a char may
> be either the same as signed char or as unsigned char.

> I had been thinking that since fiexed width type (uint88_t, etc.) are in C99
> we should use those instead.  But I see in C99 7.1.1.1 3 that fixed width
> types are optional.  I don't recall that ever causing us trouble. 

So what do I do if I want a signed 8 bit int?  How would you have fixed this 
if the ARM was wrong?



-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]