[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gpsd-dev] SemPiTernal - Bounding PPS uncertainty
From: |
Eric S. Raymond |
Subject: |
Re: [gpsd-dev] SemPiTernal - Bounding PPS uncertainty |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Apr 2016 08:48:37 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
Frank <address@hidden>:
> Hello Eric,
>
> Earlier this week I privately sent you a PDF reference document for the
> AdaFruit Hat/Breakout board GPS chip. It might have the pulse width. IIRC,
> I think it was 100ms. For those with more experience, does that sound
> reasonable? This link seems to support that:
> https://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2012-November/072111.html
Someone else (I think Hal) reported the samwe width. I'll add it to the
table.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
- [gpsd-dev] SemPiTernal - Bounding PPS uncertainty, Eric S. Raymond, 2016/04/22
- Re: [gpsd-dev] SemPiTernal - Bounding PPS uncertainty, Hal Murray, 2016/04/22
- Re: [gpsd-dev] SemPiTernal - Bounding PPS uncertainty, Phil Salkie, 2016/04/22
- Re: [gpsd-dev] SemPiTernal - Bounding PPS uncertainty, Eric S. Raymond, 2016/04/22
- Re: [gpsd-dev] SemPiTernal - Bounding PPS uncertainty, Hal Murray, 2016/04/22
- Re: [gpsd-dev] SemPiTernal - Bounding PPS uncertainty, Gary E. Miller, 2016/04/22
- Re: [gpsd-dev] SemPiTernal - Bounding PPS uncertainty, Phil Salkie, 2016/04/22
- Re: [gpsd-dev] SemPiTernal - Bounding PPS uncertainty, Gary E. Miller, 2016/04/22
- Re: [gpsd-dev] SemPiTernal - Bounding PPS uncertainty, Paul Fertser, 2016/04/23
- Re: [gpsd-dev] SemPiTernal - Bounding PPS uncertainty, Gary E. Miller, 2016/04/22