[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gpsd-dev] ✘CEP(50) 0.285 metersMime-Version: 1.0
From: |
Hal Murray |
Subject: |
Re: [gpsd-dev] ✘CEP(50) 0.285 metersMime-Version: 1.0 |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Jul 2016 17:10:58 -0700 |
address@hidden said:
> I'd rather do "long double" if I can. Then no worry about improper scaling.
> And I don't want to rewrite the Python gps.py library in fixed point.
> Execution speed is not an issue.
I'm not a language geek.
Wikipedia says:
In C and related programming languages, long double refers
to a floating-point data type that is often more precise than
double-precision.
Notice the "often" in there.
Maybe useful info here:
http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy-dev/user/basics.types.html
There is a float64 but no float128
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
- Re: [gpsd-dev] ✘CEP(50) 0.285 metersMime-Version: 1.0, (continued)
- Re: [gpsd-dev] ✘CEP(50) 0.285 metersMime-Version: 1.0, Fred Wright, 2016/07/22
- Re: [gpsd-dev] ✘CEP(50) 0.285 metersMime-Version: 1.0, Gary E. Miller, 2016/07/22
- Re: [gpsd-dev] ✘CEP(50) 0.285 metersMime-Version: 1.0, Hal Murray, 2016/07/22
- Re: [gpsd-dev] several messages, Fred Wright, 2016/07/22
- Re: [gpsd-dev] several messages, Greg Troxel, 2016/07/23
- Re: [gpsd-dev] CEP(50) 0.285 meters, Fred Wright, 2016/07/23
- Re: [gpsd-dev] CEP(50) 0.285 meters, Fred Wright, 2016/07/23
- Re: [gpsd-dev] ✘CEP(50) 0.285 meters, Gary E. Miller, 2016/07/23
- Re: [gpsd-dev] ✘CEP(50) 0.285 metersMime-Version: 1.0, Greg Troxel, 2016/07/22
- Re: [gpsd-dev] ✘CEP(50) 0.285 metersMime-Version: 1.0, Gary E. Miller, 2016/07/22
- Re: [gpsd-dev] ✘CEP(50) 0.285 metersMime-Version: 1.0,
Hal Murray <=
- Re: [gpsd-dev] ✘CEP(50) 0.285 metersMime-Version: 1.0, Gary E. Miller, 2016/07/22
- Re: [gpsd-dev] ✘CEP(50) 0.285 metersMime-Version: 1.0, Greg Troxel, 2016/07/22
- Re: [gpsd-dev] ✘CEP(50) 0.285 metersMime-Version: 1.0, Gary E. Miller, 2016/07/22