Re: long long unsigned on 32-bit machines

[Kai Harrekilde-Petersen]

On 26 Jan 2020 16.03, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> On 1/26/20 3:44 PM, Kai Harrekilde-Petersen wrote:
> > My guess is that the problem lies in the bit-selection expresion: (1 << i).
> > The 1 is a signed int by default, so forcing i to be an uint64_t
> > promotes the result to be 64 bit as well, so testing for bit 31 works
> > correctly. If this is indeed the problem, use 1UL instead.
> Good guess, I think that is the case here.
>
> I guess using
> ((unsigned int) 1 << i)  would also fix this?

Yup, two syntaxes, same result.

Kai