Re: gpsrinex epoch timestamps look wrong

[Gary E. Miller]

Yo Greg!

On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 08:29:42 -0400
Greg Troxel <address@hidden> wrote:

> > I looked at the old RINEX I managed to get throug NRCAN last year
> > and that seems to have the same issue, and yet they processed it
> > using the fractional timestamps.
> >
> > If we assume for a moment that they do not require the timestamps
> > to be perfeclty on top of the second, but they need them to be close
> > to 30 seconds apart, then maybe the code in gpsrinex.c which selects
> > which observations to save should take the fraction into account
> > so that instead of:  
> 
> FWIW, I have been recording raw .ubx from an M8T, on an Emlid Reach,
> and using their provided rtklib RINEX converter, resulting in 1s data
> interval, and have processed that via NRCAN in both static and
> kinematic mode with no issues.

Can you provide the .ubx and RINEX?  That gives us a known good .ubx and
we can compare RINEX files.

RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
        address@hidden  Tel:+1 541 382 8588

            Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
    "If you can't measure it, you can't improve it." - Lord Kelvin

pgpmdgWcEKCS7.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature