[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What happened to scons testclean?
From: |
Hal Murray |
Subject: |
Re: What happened to scons testclean? |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Dec 2020 18:53:35 -0800 |
gem@rellim.com said:
> No need for it anymore. ...
Leftover from when scons check was a bit flaky, I had scripts to run scons
check several times, capturing the printout in different log files. When
things work correctly, the first log file is different because it had to build
the code that does the check-ing. Running scons testclean made it so the
second run had to rebuild the code too and the log file would be identical.
Do you have suggestions for how to restore that functionality? I can make a
list of what gets built and delete it myself. Ugly, but probably effective.
Is there a way to build the code without running it? That would let me run a
pass 0 to build the code, then go into my loop doing the checking.
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
- What happened to scons testclean?, Hal Murray, 2020/12/10
- Re: What happened to scons testclean?, Gary E. Miller, 2020/12/10
- Re: What happened to scons testclean?,
Hal Murray <=
- Re: What happened to scons testclean?, Fred Wright, 2020/12/10
- Re: What happened to scons testclean?, Gary E. Miller, 2020/12/10
- Re: What happened to scons testclean?, Fred Wright, 2020/12/10
- Re: What happened to scons testclean?, Hal Murray, 2020/12/11
- Re: What happened to scons testclean?, Gary E. Miller, 2020/12/11
- Re: What happened to scons testclean?, Hal Murray, 2020/12/11
- Re: What happened to scons testclean?, Gary E. Miller, 2020/12/11
- Re: What happened to scons testclean?, Hal Murray, 2020/12/12