[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118
From: |
Greg Troxel |
Subject: |
Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118 |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Jan 2021 14:31:49 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (berkeley-unix) |
"Gary E. Miller" <gem@rellim.com> writes:
>> If one does say manbuild=yes, a failure is appropriate.
>
> I do not know how to tell those cases apart in the code.
>
>> This leads to variables having values no/auto/yes, where auto means
>> yes with a warning only if no tool and yes means fail if no tool. A
>> bunch of work that I have no desire to do, but if somebody else did
>> I'd see it as an improvement.
>
> We would have to replace scons options processor, that would be a PITA.
> Some other way? Maybe option: forcemanpages?
If it's hard, I think how things are now is good enough.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Gary E. Miller, 2021/01/25
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Sanjeev Gupta, 2021/01/25
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Sanjeev Gupta, 2021/01/27
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Gary E. Miller, 2021/01/27
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Greg Troxel, 2021/01/28
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Gary E. Miller, 2021/01/28
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118,
Greg Troxel <=
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Gary E. Miller, 2021/01/28
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Sanjeev Gupta, 2021/01/30
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Gary E. Miller, 2021/01/31
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Hal Murray, 2021/01/31