[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ✘Draft GPSD-MIB
From: |
Greg Troxel |
Subject: |
Re: ✘Draft GPSD-MIB |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Jul 2022 09:20:16 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (berkeley-unix) |
Mike Simpson <mikie.simpson@gmail.com> writes:
[context lost while recovering from top posting]
> Im not sure why you would want to use a network monitoring protocol to relay
> that information.
>
> Wouldn’t you want fix/no fix, rtk/ no rtk etc on the basis that you could
> then be aware of a problem without being on the box which is what snmp was
> for?
>
> Including data that gpsd gives out freely already seems an odd way to skin
> the cat.
I am not following at all. Having management status available is
separate from making the actual position available. I would expect
normal practice is to have gpsd make the gpsd socket data available on
localhost only.
But I have no particular reason to want to deal with SNMP.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Re: ✘Draft GPSD-MIB, Gary E. Miller, 2022/07/07