[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ✘64-bit time_t on glibc 2.34 and up
From: |
Gary E. Miller |
Subject: |
Re: ✘64-bit time_t on glibc 2.34 and up |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Jan 2023 16:41:56 -0800 |
Yo Greg!
On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 19:33:35 -0500
Greg Troxel <gdt@lexort.com> wrote:
> [dropping ntpsec because they bounced my mail]
>
> "Gary E. Miller" <gem@rellim.com> writes:
>
> >> but int is ok in
> >> practice, on ILP32. On IP16L32, it's not, but we aren't building
> >> for PDP-11 any more :-)
> >
> > What is ILP32? Or IP16L32?
>
> ILP32 means int, long and pointer are all 32 bits. Like the vax, and
> i386.
>
> LP64 means long/* are 64, and by implication int is 32. Like x86_64,
> sparc64, aarch74
>
> ILP64 means int is also 64. Like alpha.
>
> IP16L32 I just made up; 16-bit ints and pointers, 32 longs. That's
> the UNIX ABI on PDP-11.
Interesting. I see the glibc headers files use that notation.
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
gem@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588
Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
"If you can't measure it, you can't improve it." - Lord Kelvin
pgp2fxajxE1fs.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- ✘64-bit time_t on glibc 2.34 and up, Gary E. Miller, 2023/01/12
- Re: ✘64-bit time_t on glibc 2.34 and up, Greg Troxel, 2023/01/13
- Re: ✘64-bit time_t on glibc 2.34 and up, Gary E. Miller, 2023/01/13
- Re: ✘64-bit time_t on glibc 2.34 and up, Greg Troxel, 2023/01/13
- Re: ✘64-bit time_t on glibc 2.34 and up, Greg Troxel, 2023/01/13
- Re: ✘64-bit time_t on glibc 2.34 and up, Gary E. Miller, 2023/01/13
- Re: ✘64-bit time_t on glibc 2.34 and up, Greg Troxel, 2023/01/14
- Re: ✘64-bit time_t on glibc 2.34 and up, Gary E. Miller, 2023/01/14
- Re: ✘64-bit time_t on glibc 2.34 and up, Gary E. Miller, 2023/01/13
- Re: ✘64-bit time_t on glibc 2.34 and up, Greg Troxel, 2023/01/14
- Re: ✘64-bit time_t on glibc 2.34 and up, Gary E. Miller, 2023/01/14
- Re: ✘64-bit time_t on glibc 2.34 and up, Greg Troxel, 2023/01/15
- Re: ✘64-bit time_t on glibc 2.34 and up, Gary E. Miller, 2023/01/15