[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Grammatica-devel] @Override

From: Hilco Wijbenga
Subject: Re: [Grammatica-devel] @Override
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:23:43 -0700

(I'm including both lists now to move the discussion to
grammatica-users. Please only reply on grammatica-users.)

Given that the current trunk has multiple build problems I didn't get
around to my original reason for checking out the source code. :-) So
no patches yet for @Override.

The current trunk outputs the Grammar*.java files into the root
instead of the net.percederberg.grammatica package. I was able to fix
it but I assume there was a reason to take out the package reference
so I doubt my putting it back in would be the right way forward. There
are also two unit tests that fail. I didn't look into that yet.

It looks like someone was half way through some changes and then
committed before being fully done.


2009/9/20 Per Cederberg <address@hidden>:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Connor Robert Prussin <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 18:25
> Subject: Re: [Grammatica-devel] @Override
> To: Per Cederberg <address@hidden>
> Hey Guys-
> I'd be happy to take a look at the code!  I've been really busy
> lately, and have a few of Oliver's proposals to work on still; however
> I have full plans on working on those and getting them merged in.
> Hilco- if you have any patches already, I'd be happy to take a look at
> them and commit them for you.  If you want commit access, Per will
> need to set it up.
> I think that there is a lot that can be migrated to Java 1.6-style
> code.  I worked a bit on it, but focused mostly on new code so I
> didn't get much done.
> Connor
> On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 4:40 AM, Per Cederberg <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Hi Hilco,
>> All code contributions are gladly accepted. Haven't had time to review
>> the code myself for a long time, but Connor has been working on the
>> Grammatica codebase during the summer. Perhaps he has time to review
>> and apply any patches?
>> The codegen step should create code in the package of your choice,
>> which for the parser itself has always been
>> net.percederberg.grammatica.parser I think. Or something similar.
>> @Connor: Do you subscribe to this mailing list? I guess we should
>> really merge it into the normal grammatica-users list due to the low
>> traffic of both lists... Well, well.
>> Cheers,
>> /Per
>> On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 04:11, Hilco Wijbenga <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> I wanted to see if I could add "@Override" to the generated code where
>>> necessary because Eclipse was complaining about it. So I checked out
>>> the code from Subversion but trunk doesn't build.
>>> The current build uses source="1.4" and target="1.5" but the source is
>>> 1.5 (it uses enum and generics). I also noticed some warnings that can
>>> be easily fixed (generics again).
>>> The codegen step generates code in src/java instead of
>>> src/java/net/percederberg/grammatica. I could easily fix all this and
>>> send in a patch but I don't want to step on anyone's toes or interfere
>>> with ongoing work. So I thought I'd ask first. :-)
>>> Cheers,
>>> Hilco
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Grammatica-devel mailing list
>>> address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]