[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[groff] 07/12: doc/groff.texi.in: Clarify wording.
From: |
G. Branden Robinson |
Subject: |
[groff] 07/12: doc/groff.texi.in: Clarify wording. |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:33:11 -0500 (EST) |
gbranden pushed a commit to branch master
in repository groff.
commit 5cda98e6daef2bbd2d47b179b3667d210ee5da4c
Author: G. Branden Robinson <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com>
AuthorDate: Tue Nov 19 12:35:35 2024 -0600
doc/groff.texi.in: Clarify wording.
---
doc/groff.texi.in | 31 ++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/groff.texi.in b/doc/groff.texi.in
index eb0c458d2..08ac68dcb 100644
--- a/doc/groff.texi.in
+++ b/doc/groff.texi.in
@@ -8333,19 +8333,19 @@ This is an uninteresting sentence.
To clearly present the next couple of requests, we must introduce the
concept of ``productive'' input lines. A @dfn{productive input line} is
one that directly produces formatted output. Text lines produce
-output,@footnote{unless diverted; see @ref{Diversions}} as do control
-lines containing requests like @code{tl} or escape sequences like
-@code{\D}. Macro calls are not @emph{directly} productive, and thus not
-counted, but their interpolated contents can be. Empty requests, and
-requests and escape sequences that define registers or strings or alter
-the formatting environment (as with changes to the size, face, height,
-slant, or color of the type) are not productive.@footnote{If you're not
-sure whether an input line has been productive, you can use the
-@code{pline} request before and after it to see whether it produced any
-output nodes. @xref{Debugging}.} We will also preview the output line
-continuation escape sequence, @code{\c}, which ``connects'' two input
-lines that would otherwise be counted separately. @footnote{@xref{Line
-Continuation}.}
+output,@footnote{though not necessarily to the output device; see
+@ref{Diversions}} as do control lines containing requests like @code{tl}
+or escape sequences like @code{\D}. Macro calls are not @emph{directly}
+productive, and thus not counted, but their interpolated contents can
+be. Empty requests, and requests and escape sequences that define
+registers or strings or alter the formatting environment (as with
+changes to the size, face, height, slant, or color of the type) are not
+productive.@footnote{If you're not sure whether an input line has been
+productive, you can use the @code{pline} request before and after it to
+see whether it produced any output nodes. @xref{Debugging}.} We will
+also preview the output line continuation escape sequence, @code{\c},
+which ``connects'' two input lines that would otherwise be counted
+separately. @footnote{@xref{Line Continuation}.}
@Example
@c .ll 56n
@@ -8593,8 +8593,9 @@ exceptions override any rules that would normally apply
to a word
matching a hyphenation exception defined with @code{hw}.
Situations also arise when only a specific occurrence of a word needs
-its hyphenation altered or suppressed, or when a URL or similar string
-needs to be breakable in sensible places without hyphenation.
+its hyphenation altered or suppressed, or when a URL or similar
+specialized text needs to be breakable in sensible places without
+hyphenation.
@DefescList {\\%, , , }
@DefescListEndx {\:, , , }
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [groff] 07/12: doc/groff.texi.in: Clarify wording.,
G. Branden Robinson <=