[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Groff] Re: New html docs
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
[Groff] Re: New html docs |
Date: |
Sat, 01 Jan 2000 16:09:19 GMT |
> Many thanks to Eddie for forwarding me some missing emails. After
> reading much discussion about missing html documents I thought I'd
> make a start on documenting the tmac.arkup including some examples.
>
> Here is where I've got to in producing documentation for grohtml.
> Werner: I've placed this document into the doc directory any chance
> it can be checked into cvs?
Dear Gaius,
the logical place and name for a file describing tmac.arkup is
groff_markup.man placed into the `tmac' subdirectory, and your html.ms
looks like being this kind of file.
So I won't check it in currently -- may I ask you to convert this file
to a man page?
Another related problem: I can imagine that a lot of people start to
write man pages with HTML output in mind also. Nevertheless, it
should be still possible to display such pages correctly with a plain
text man pager. As a consequence, such man pages should contain at
the beginning something like
.do mso tmac.arkup
What do you think?
Werner
- [Groff] Re: New html docs,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: [Groff] Re: New html docs, Eddie Maddox, 2000/01/01
- Re: [Groff] Re: New html docs, Werner LEMBERG, 2000/01/01
- Re: [Groff] Re: New html docs, Eddie Maddox, 2000/01/01
- Re: [Groff] Re: New html docs, Werner LEMBERG, 2000/01/01
- [Groff] texi2html prob., Eddie Maddox, 2000/01/02
- [Groff] ms docs?, Eddie Maddox, 2000/01/02
- [Groff] Re: ms docs?, Werner LEMBERG, 2000/01/02
- Re: [Groff] Re: ms docs?, Eddie Maddox, 2000/01/02
- Re: [Groff] Re: ms docs?, Ted Harding, 2000/01/02
- Re: [Groff] Re: ms docs?, Eddie Maddox, 2000/01/02