[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] new grohtml was (HTML fonts)
From: |
Gaius Mulley |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] new grohtml was (HTML fonts) |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Jan 2000 21:44:36 +0000 (GMT) |
> My idea was rather to add special markers for tables, breaks, etc.
> to the input data which will survive processing by troff.
> *Then* you can send the relevant chunks to grops.
>
> groff -t -e -p -ms -Thtml ...
>
> raw troff input | | troff output
> V V
>
> grohtml stage one
>
> | \
> raw+markers | \ raw HTML, using raw troff input data
> | for further analysis
> V
> |
> groff -t -e -p -ms -Tps ... |
> |
> troff output | |
> V V
> check images
> grohtml stage two ------------> final HTML output
>
> cut troff output | ^
> V |
> PS output |
> grops ---------------+
>
>
>
> I hope my sketch can be understood :-)
>
pic src would be better - no just kidding. I like
the idea of the markers - this will help .br .in .ce etc
but the biggest problem so far in current grohtml
is the textual table. Will the above solve this?
What is grohtml stage one doing, my understanding is that it:
(i) reads in raw troff input - adds say \X html-ce
\X html-br etc etc for all the markers.
(ii) produces raw HTML using by correlating the raw troff
input with the troff output ??
(iii) raw + markers get sent to groff -Tps
to generate images
then grohtml stage two
(i) checks to see whether the troff output (needs troff
output -Thtml as well?) can produce simple eqn's etc
without using -Tps ?
[ Actually can't grohtml stage 1 decide
whether the eqn etc can be produced using html gylphs
rather than stage2 - unless I've misunderstood something :-) ]
cheers Gaius
- [Groff] HTML fonts, Werner LEMBERG, 2000/01/22
- Re: [Groff] HTML fonts, Gaius Mulley, 2000/01/22
- Re: [Groff] HTML fonts, Werner LEMBERG, 2000/01/23
- Re: [Groff] HTML fonts, Gaius Mulley, 2000/01/23
- Re: [Groff] HTML fonts, Werner LEMBERG, 2000/01/23
- Re: [Groff] new grohtml was (HTML fonts), Gaius Mulley, 2000/01/24
- Re: [Groff] new grohtml was (HTML fonts), Werner LEMBERG, 2000/01/24
- Re: [Groff] new grohtml was (HTML fonts),
Gaius Mulley <=
- Re: [Groff] new grohtml was (HTML fonts), Werner LEMBERG, 2000/01/25
- Re: [Groff] HTML fonts, Gaius Mulley, 2000/01/23