[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] surprise, surprise
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] surprise, surprise |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Aug 2001 07:49:06 +0200 (CEST) |
> As far as I am concerned, the only time that troff/groff/*roff
> should ever interpret a "'" or "." as a control/command character is
> when it appears as the FIRST character in a line of input. If it is
> preceded by \fB or anything else, it should always be treated as
> ordinary text.
I fully agree.
> The only exception would be when the only preceding characters are
> whitespace, which troff interprets as a break, equivalent to ".br".
I don't understand that. Please give an example.
Werner
- RE: [Groff] .cf and .trf, (continued)
- RE: [Groff] .cf and .trf, Sigfrid Lundberg, Netlab, 2001/08/31
- RE: [Groff] #ifdef WIDOW_CONTROL???, Ted Harding, 2001/08/30
- RE: [Groff] #ifdef WIDOW_CONTROL???, Sigfrid Lundberg, Netlab, 2001/08/30
- RE: [Groff] #ifdef WIDOW_CONTROL???, Ted Harding, 2001/08/30
- RE: [Groff] #ifdef WIDOW_CONTROL???, Sigfrid Lundberg, Netlab, 2001/08/31
- Re: [Groff] surprise, surprise, Clarke Echols, 2001/08/27
- Re: [Groff] surprise, surprise, Andrew Koenig, 2001/08/27
- Re: [Groff] surprise, surprise, Ralph Corderoy, 2001/08/28
- Re: [Groff] surprise, surprise, Ted Harding, 2001/08/28
- Re: [Groff] surprise, surprise, Clarke Echols, 2001/08/26
- Re: [Groff] surprise, surprise,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: [Groff] surprise, surprise, Clarke Echols, 2001/08/27
- Re: [Groff] surprise, surprise, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/08/28