Re: [Groff] checkeq functionality available?

[Stewart C. Russell]

Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> 
> If so, it might be worth just trying `eqn "$@" >/dev/null' in a checkeq
> shell script to see if that satisfies your user.

Solaris still has checkeq. It's pretty small, and the only things it
seems to report are:

   Spurious EQ, line %d
   EQ in %c%c, line %d
   Spurious EN, line %d
   EN in %c%c, line %d
   Delim off, line %d
   New delims %c%c, line %d
   %c%c in EQ, line %d
   %d line %c%c, lines %d-%d
   %d line %c%c, lines %d-%d
   Unfinished %c%c
   Unfinished EQ

(the above from "strings `which checkeq`")

 Stewart