[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] -me and macroses
|
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] -me and macroses |
|
Date: |
Thu, 06 Dec 2001 15:23:18 +0100 (CET) |
> Wow! Might it then also be possible in the future
> to nest macro calls (as in ".yy \*[xx]"), or is this
> ruled out a priori because macros are simply string
> replacements and not function calls?
The former, so it isn't possible. groff only has macros, and no
functions.
Werner
- [Groff] -me and macroses, Mike Iokhvin, 2001/12/03
- Re: [Groff] -me and macroses, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/12/03
- Re: [Groff] -me and macroses, Tadziu Hoffmann, 2001/12/03
- Re: [Groff] -me and macroses, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/12/04
- Re: [Groff] -me and macroses, Tadziu Hoffmann, 2001/12/05
- Re: [Groff] -me and macroses, Bernd Warken, 2001/12/05
- Re: [Groff] -me and macroses, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/12/07
- Re: [Groff] -me and macroses, Bernd Warken, 2001/12/07
- Re: [Groff] -me and macroses,
Werner LEMBERG <=
Re: [Groff] -me and macroses, Ralph Corderoy, 2001/12/03