[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] groff_ms.man
From: |
ralph |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] groff_ms.man |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Jan 2002 22:15:09 +0000 |
Hi Werner,
> > > That should also be added to groff.texinfo -- I think there's a
> > > placeholder section for it, but it hasn't been written yet.
>
> Yes. groff_char(7) should be translated to texinfo.
Has anyone asked GNU/rms if groff can be an exception to the rule? rms
seems happy that things like Ogg Vorbis aren't GPL or LGPL because of
their circumstances. So exceptions are possible.
> The following should do it perfectly:
>
> .char \[el] .\|.\|.\&
>
> No need to access glyph 188 of the special font.
>
> If you all agree, I'll add it to troff.rc -- what about using the
> entity name `ell' which is probably more mnemonic?
How about \[...] as even more mnemonic?
Cheers,
Ralph.
- [Groff] groff_ms.man, Werner LEMBERG, 2002/01/17
- Re: [Groff] groff_ms.man, P. Alejandro Lopez-Valencia, 2002/01/19
- Re: [Groff] groff_ms.man, Larry Kollar, 2002/01/19
- Re: [Groff] groff_ms.man, P. Alejandro Lopez-Valencia, 2002/01/19
- Re: [Groff] groff_ms.man, Werner LEMBERG, 2002/01/22
- Re: [Groff] groff_ms.man,
ralph <=
- Re: [Groff] groff_ms.man, Werner LEMBERG, 2002/01/23
- Re: [Groff] groff_ms.man, Ralph Corderoy, 2002/01/23
- Re: [Groff] groff_ms.man, Werner LEMBERG, 2002/01/24
- Re: [Groff] groff_ms.man, Stewart C. Russell, 2002/01/24
- Re: [Groff] groff_ms.man, Werner LEMBERG, 2002/01/24
- Re: [Groff] groff_ms.man, Stewart C. Russell, 2002/01/24
- Re: [Groff] groff_ms.man (info flamebait), Rick Richardson, 2002/01/24
- Re: [Groff] groff_ms.man (info flamebait), Ralph Corderoy, 2002/01/24
- Re: [Groff] groff_ms.man, Ted Harding, 2002/01/24
- Re: [Groff] groff_ms.man, Stewart C. Russell, 2002/01/24