[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] Possible Difference Between Bell Labs and GNU?
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] Possible Difference Between Bell Labs and GNU? |
Date: |
Sat, 09 Feb 2002 00:47:18 +0100 (CET) |
> It's a very simple awk script, downloadable from
> http://troff.org/source.html
Thanks for the info. Will do that soon.
> > groff's eqn is heavily based on TeX, using many features of it to
> > improve formula handling. So it is probably a feature to have
> > such small differences.
>
> How would one write `Data sub {n-1}' in that toungue whose name I
> will not mention here and I'll try and give it a go.
Do you mean Lord Voldemort, ahem, TeX?
Try this:
$\hbox{Data}_{n-1}$
\bye
Of course, this uses the TeX's CM fonts and not Times Roman.
> Here's GNU pic.
>
> % ( echo .PS ; echo line dotted ; echo .PE ) | pic
> ...
> \h'0.050i'\v'0.000i'\D'l0.000i 0.000i'
> ...
>
> And AIX pic, probably similiar to Bentley's.
>
> $ ( echo .PS ; echo line dotted ; echo .PE ) | pic
> ...
> \h'0.050i'\&.
> ...
>
> So GNU ends up producing PostScript that draws a line from point X
> to point X resulting in a very pale dot. Bell Labs use a full stop.
You can force pic to do the same if you specify the -n option.
Alternatively, try to experiment with the `linethick' variable.
Werner