[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] bug in version 1.18
|
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] bug in version 1.18 |
|
Date: |
Sun, 01 Dec 2002 21:41:13 +0100 (CET) |
> Would it make sense to rewrite ``.de1 AT'' as ``.if !d AT .de1 AT'',
> and similarly for .UC?
Good question. I don't know. My personal feeling is no since it
makes the man package more complicated.
> Also, .AT and .UC are of historical interest only; would you still
> like we document them in the manpage?
Yes. I dislike undocumented stuff.
> If so, should they be briefly documented, or in full-depth details?
A short explanation should be sufficient -- people should know that
`AT' and `UC' are in use.
Werner