[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re: [Groff] groff documentation
From: |
Greg 'groggy' Lehey |
Subject: |
Re: Re: [Groff] groff documentation |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Dec 2002 14:56:22 +1030 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
*sigh* My Emacs macros change my From: address when they find anybody
from the FreeBSD project on the To: or Cc:, so this is currently
awaiting moderator approval. Sorry about that.
Greg
----- Forwarded message from Greg 'groggy' Lehey <address@hidden> -----
> Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 11:30:11 +1030
> From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey <address@hidden>
> To: Larry McVoy <address@hidden>
> Cc: Ruslan Ermilov <address@hidden>, Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden>,
> address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [Groff] groff documentation
>
> On Sunday, 1 December 2002 at 7:49:02 -0800, Larry McVoy wrote:
>> I have the BSD based source to all the troff stuff:
>>
>> 01.begin/ 08.mh/ 15.vi/ 22.memacros/ 29.refer/ DONE
>> 02.learn/ 09.newsread/ 16.ex/ 23.meref/ 30.invert/ SCCS/
>> 03.shell/ 10.etiq/ 17.jove/ 24.troff/ 31.bib/ grap.ps
>> 04.csh/ 11.notes/ 18.sed/ 25.trofftut/ 32.diction/ title
>> 05.dc/ 12.edtut/ 19.awk/ 26.eqn/ 33.rogue/
>> 06.bc/ 13.edadv/ 20.msmacros/ 27.eqnguide/ 34.trek/
>> 07.Mail/ 14.edit/ 21.msdiffs/ 28.tbl/ 99.pic/
>>
>> 99.pic is Raymond's rewrite.
>>
>> I'm wondering if we could get a project going to transfer the groff
>> extensions to this baseline so we could have an up to date version
>> of the docs written in *roff. I've always found it weird that groff
>> docs aren't in roff, seems a bit lame.
>>
>> I have to dig through my mail to make sure it's legal (I discussed this
>> with Dennis and Brian and I think got an OK) but I suspect it's fine,
>> the date on these is old enough that copyright protection has long
>> since expired.
>
> I think you'll find that these files are under the same license as the
> rest of Research UNIX. This license most definitely has not expired.
> It belongs to SCO (no, sorry, Caldera (no, sorry, SCO after all)).
> Earlier this year it was changed to be a BSD-style license, so it's
> definitely OK. The only thing that worries me is that SCO doesn't
> have anything about the license on their web site.
>
> Greg
> --
> See complete headers for address and phone numbers
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Finger address@hidden for PGP public key
See complete headers for address and phone numbers
Re: [Groff] groff documentation, Greg 'groggy' Lehey, 2002/12/01
Re: Re: [Groff] groff documentation,
Greg 'groggy' Lehey <=