[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Groff] On the glyphs `~=' and `|='
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
[Groff] On the glyphs `~=' and `|=' |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Dec 2002 07:36:01 +0100 (CET) |
Some thoughts on the glyphs `~=' and `|='; please tell me if you
disagree with my research below.
`~=': In the Unix Text Processing book, it is called
`approx. equal', but the glyph displayed is definitely wrong.
The Unicode charts display for U+2245 APPROXIMATELY EQUAL TO
an equal sign and a wavy line stacked vertically; groff uses
`=~' for this glyph (PS glyph name `congruent').
groff's groff_char.man page gives two wavy lines stacked
vertically. An alias is the glyph name `~~'.
The original CSTR 54 document doesn't contain this glyph.
The AGL assigns the PS glyph name `approxequal' to U+2248
ALMOST EQUAL TO which is what groff uses.
Conclusion: `~=' is a misleading glyph name. For backwards
compatibility, I will leave it as-is, so it is not
`approx. equal' but `almost equal to'.
`|=': Missing in the Unix Text Processing book.
Missing in groff 1.18.1. I'll add it right now.
CSTR 54 stacks a minus sign with a wavy line (using a small PS
subroutine to synthesize the shape); this is U+2243
ASYMPTOTICALLY EQUAL TO.
Werner
- [Groff] On the glyphs `~=' and `|=',
Werner LEMBERG <=