[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Groff] Is _M considered an internal register of -me?
From: |
James J. Ramsey |
Subject: |
[Groff] Is _M considered an internal register of -me? |
Date: |
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 09:43:46 -0800 (PST) |
I wanted to redefine the ".$c" macro in -me to print
chapter headings the way I wanted them printed.
However, I noticed that by default ".$c" used the _M
register, which is used by the ".++" macro to indicate
whether one is in the prefatory matter section, the
chapter section, appendix section, etc. I was thinking
of using the _M register in my redefined ".$c" macro
for the same purpose, but I wasn't sure that _M was a
"safe" register to use, that is, a register that I can
count on existing from version to version of -me. I
have not found any reference to register _M in the -ME
Reference Manual, nor in the man page. So far as I can
tell, it seems to be solely for internal use, yet it
is used in macros that are intended to be redefined.
Can I count on the _M register to remain in at least
the groff version of the -me macros, Or should I write
a ".$c" macro under the assumption that _M may not
always be available?
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Groff] Is _M considered an internal register of -me?,
James J. Ramsey <=