Re: [Groff] mom problems

[Peter Schaffter]

On Thu, May 22, 2003, Egil Kvaleberg wrote:
> But wouldn't it be better to use a numeric argument? If it is 0, or
> missing, do as usual. If it is 1, return one extra level, 2 for two
> extra levels and so fort. That would make this feature less "sensible"
> and easier to comprehend.

"...less 'sensible' and easier to comprehend"?

I don't know what's worse: the paradox, or the fact that I actually
get it. :)

-- 
Peter Schaffter

Author of _The Schumann Proof_, appearing fall, 2004
(pub. RendezVous Press, Canada)