[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] Bugs in grohtml
From: |
Peter Schaffter |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] Bugs in grohtml |
Date: |
Thu, 29 May 2003 00:30:32 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.0.1i |
On Wed, May 28, 2003, James J. Ramsey wrote:
>
> -mom with -Thtml could be expected to be awful for
> general web page design, but not so bad for putting a
> novel online. That's presuming no bugs in grohtml, of
> course, which is rather silly, since it's alpha code.
> Still, nothing wrong with trying.
Indeed. In fact, I kinda keep hoping grohtml will mature a bit,
precisely so that it can produce goodlooking html from basic -mom
formatted docs. The advantage for writers who aren't particularly
technically minded of using a single output engine (groff) and a
single formatting package (like mom) for their work is
considerable.
--
Peter Schaffter
Author of _The Schumann Proof_, appearing fall, 2004
(pub. RendezVous Press, Canada)
- [Groff] Bugs in grohtml, James J. Ramsey, 2003/05/28
- Re: [Groff] Bugs in grohtml, Peter Schaffter, 2003/05/28
- Re: [Groff] Bugs in grohtml, James J. Ramsey, 2003/05/28
- Re: [Groff] Bugs in grohtml,
Peter Schaffter <=
- Re: [Groff] Bugs in grohtml, Gaius Mulley, 2003/05/29
- Re: [Groff] Bugs in grohtml, Robert D. Goulding, 2003/05/29
- Re: [Groff] Bugs in grohtml, Werner LEMBERG, 2003/05/30
- Re: [Groff] Bugs in grohtml, Jorgen Grahn, 2003/05/30
- Re: [Groff] Bugs in grohtml, Werner LEMBERG, 2003/05/31
- Re: [Groff] Bugs in grohtml, Peter Schaffter, 2003/05/29
- Re: [Groff] Bugs in grohtml, Werner LEMBERG, 2003/05/30
Re: [Groff] Bugs in grohtml, Gaius Mulley, 2003/05/29