[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Groff] .de @NH quasi-bug in s.tmac?
|
From: |
Dorai Sitaram |
|
Subject: |
[Groff] .de @NH quasi-bug in s.tmac? |
|
Date: |
Fri, 22 Aug 2003 13:35:58 -0400 (EDT) |
In s.tmac, in the definition of address@hidden, the last thing it
does is
.SH
\\*[SN]
I think it should instead do
address@hidden
\\*[SN]
This would allow users to cleanly redefine .NH
and .SH in terms of address@hidden and address@hidden, no?
(In other words, address@hidden should be dependent on address@hidden, not
.SH.)
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Groff] .de @NH quasi-bug in s.tmac?,
Dorai Sitaram <=