[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] Re: new grohtml patches
From: |
Gaius Mulley |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] Re: new grohtml patches |
Date: |
06 Nov 2003 15:31:21 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Gaius Mulley <address@hidden> writes:
> Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > > > Hmm, the actual code is e.g.
> > > >
> > > > <p align=center>Figure 6-5: <b>circle fill; move; circle
> > > > fill 0.4; move; circle</b></p>
> > > >
> > > > <p align=center><b>fill 0.9;</b></p>
> > > >
> > > > There are neither tabs nor indentation, as far as I can see. I
> > > > think this should be rather
> > > >
> > > > <p align=center>Figure 6-5: <b>circle fill; move; circle
> > > > fill 0.4; move; circle fill 0.9;</b></p>
> > >
> > > yes this is desirable. My comment on the line length set to
> > > infinity was a general one. But I guess we could set the line
> > > length temporarily to infinity when we are processing a .ce request
> > > and nofill == 0. Would there be any side effects if this were done?
> >
> > Currently I can't find a counterexample.
>
> ok, thanks. On another note I think my patch has introduced a bug in
> troff :-(. I'm frantically trying to fix it..
hmm, interesting - it appears my test code was at fault. I didn't have
a `.br' at the start and end of a diversion and this caused weird
output. Strangely the behavior changed between CVS of July and CVS
prior to the new grohtml patches.
Anyway end of panic..
Gaius