[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Groff] Re: groff regression tests
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
[Groff] Re: groff regression tests |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Jul 2004 08:54:29 +0200 (CEST) |
> my preference would be to push forward with making the regression
> tests stress test the troff ditroff output destined for grohtml.
Fine. Recent gcc versions come with code coverage tools so you can
actually check which code has actually been executed.
> It will also serve as a really good method to quickly check that any
> change has not broken some obscure usage. What do you think? How
> desperate are you to release the next groff version?
As usual, I would like to have small, incremental changes if possible.
Can you provide them? I think there isn't an urgent need for a new
release. I'm on vacation the next six weeks, with just a small
bandwidth connection. September or October would be a good deadline
for 1.19.2.
groffers, please complain loudly if you have a different opinion.
Werner