[Groff] Re: Description of grohtml tags needed

[Werner LEMBERG]

> > You say we have this:
> > 
> >   a
> >   .tag foo    ->    a \&\X^html:foo^b
> >   b
> > 
> > and that:
> > 
> >   a
> >   .tag1 foo   ->    a \X^html:foo^b
> >   b
> > 
> > Is my interpretation correct?
> 
> your interpretation is nearly correct.
> 
>    a
>    .tag foo    ->    a \&\X^html:foo^ b
>    b

Thanks.  Ugly, ugly :-) Again, there isn't any other request which
behaves like that.

> The principle of removing `.tag' and renaming `.tag1' to tag would
> work.  Basically both HTML-NS and HTML macros in www.tmac could be
> implemented via this new `.tag'.

Please do so.  IMHO this is much easier to understand, and we have one
request less.

> [...] perhaps it might also be a good idea to create a new tmac.tag
> file with all the documented tags.

This would be tag.tmac -- yes, this yields more modularity which is
always a good thing.

> The macro names `HTML' and `HTML-NS' in www.tmac could be replaced
> with less device specific prefixes, say: DEV-TAG.

Or just `.TAG' and `.TAG-NS'?


    Werner