[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Savannah-help-public] Re: [Groff] Mailing list munging code
From: |
Sylvain Beucler |
Subject: |
Re: [Savannah-help-public] Re: [Groff] Mailing list munging code |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 08:37:18 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
Hello,
Do you refer to public or private archives? (they are not managed the
same way; public=>mhonarc, private=>mailman).
Also, can you give us links to sample posts that illustrate your
concerns?
--
Sylvain
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 08:10:20AM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> > Looking back in the archives for the original posting of the MN
> > macros, I noticed (in the post at
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/groff/2002-12/msg00097.html) that
> > the references to internal -ms macros had been identified by the
> > mailing-list manager as email addresses and protected against spam,
> > so that address@hidden, for instance, is turned into
> > address@hidden Is there any way to stop this happening
> > - and to recover the unmunged versions of past posts?
>
> A very good question. The mailman version on lists.gnu.org only
> offers this setting:
>
> obscure_addresses (privacy): Show member addresses so they're not
> directly recognizable as email
> addresses?
>
> Setting this option causes member email addresses to be transformed
> when they are presented on list web pages (both in text and as
> links), so they're not trivially recognizable as email addresses.
> The intention is to prevent the addresses from being snarfed up by
> automated web scanners for use by spammers.
>
> Basically, this is a good option and should be active. On the other
> hand, the used regexp to recognize email addresses is not
> sophisticated enough IMHO. address@hidden' isn't a valid global email
> adress; I think that mailman should check whether there is a dot in
> the part after the `@'.
>
> Savannah hackers, what can we do to get an improved behaviour? And
> how can attachments survive unmodified (this is, staying as extra
> files with a link to it in the archived mail)?
- [Groff] Mailing list munging code, Robert Goulding, 2005/01/19
- Re: [Groff] Mailing list munging code, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/01/20
- Re: [Savannah-help-public] Re: [Groff] Mailing list munging code,
Sylvain Beucler <=
- Re: [Savannah-help-public] Re: [Groff] Mailing list munging code, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/01/20
- Re: [Savannah-help-public] Re: [Groff] Mailing list munging code, Sylvain Beucler, 2005/01/23
- Re: [Savannah-help-public] Re: [Groff] Mailing list munging code, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/01/21
- Re: [Savannah-help-public] Re: [Groff] Mailing list munging code, Sylvain Beucler, 2005/01/23
- Re: [Savannah-help-public] Re: [Groff] Mailing list munging code, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/01/23
- Re: [Savannah-help-public] Re: [Groff] Mailing list munging code, M Bianchi, 2005/01/23